This post is on the Pro-Mistresses etc web board (moved from Other BDSM).
| Thu 28 May 09, 7:46 PM mini_velvet UK(EH), 6 yrs  |
Following on from another thread I just wondered what people's view of financial domination is. No colours or shapes | ||
| 28 May 09, 7:49 PM moghalman UK(EC), 12 yrs  |
P_F_H_F's view is spot on | ||
| 28 May 09, 8:20 PM Devodiva AT, 2 yrs |
hello everybody, i am new to this community. So please excuse if I make a technical mistake. This is my first post. What do I think about financial domination? I think it is a clear deal. You give and you get. And one should know what this business is all about. I imagine it can be a very tough job as well as great fun. My respect goes out to everybody who works in this field as long as they take responsibility. I do not think that it is an easy way to make a living. And I am sure that many people would have to be frustrated without having the chance to expirience how it fiels to be a sub. They see no other way than to pay for it. And they all have their reasons to go about it like that. all | ||
| 28 May 09, 8:31 PM lisal 8 yrs |
I think it's fine, like other BDSM things, if it's done by two consenting adults. I know a number of people who derive great pleasure from it It holds no appeal for me and my general feeling is that it's better (like other BDSM things) that you (particularly the giver) make sure that you are involved with someone you know and/or who has a good reputation If I was into it I'd only do it with my domme. However, I am aware that, for some, the thrill is in being finacially controlled by someone they don't know | ||
| 28 May 09, 9:01 PM Jahc99 UK, 5 yrs |
Remember this thread... http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/130047/0 I haven't forgotten how it ended. Why poison your liver when I could eat it for you? Edited 28 May 09, 9:02 PM by Jahc99 | ||
| 28 May 09, 11:06 PM Lady_Lucan UK(L), 4 yrs |
Funny that this should come up twice in one day. Here's what I posted over on UKM: FinDom is something that I've begun to explore quite organically during my first year as a PD. Interestingly, this came about in tandem with developments in my own lifestyle D/s. For me, it strikes right at the heart of the dynamic - knowing the sub's weaknesses and insecurities, knowing what makes their heart flutter, controlling and tailoring their responses, slowly but surely becoming a driving presence in their lives. It enables me as a Dominatrix to really get into a sub's psyche, and to do it well requires immense mental, especially linguistic, ability. I'm relishing the challenge. They that love not Tobacco & Boies were fooles. | ||
| 28 May 09, 11:37 PM Lady_Anna_Bradford UK(BD), 5 yrs   |
I think people can have whatever view they want to about FinDom but to call Dommes who enjoy this fetish adjectives such vile, greedy and everything else he spews out of his ill-informed judgemental mouth is plain fucking ignorant...and that goes for everyone else who agrees with him. YKINOK - Something that I believe is breaking the AUP Just because YOU don't have the imagination to understand it doesn't mean that thousands of consenting adults are wrong. "If no sexual offence is being committed it seems very odd indeed that there should be an offence for having an image of something which was not an offence," Lord Wallace of Tankerness Edited 28 May 09, 11:38 PM by Lady_Anna_Bradford | ||
| 29 May 09, 12:05 AM Lady_Anna_Bradford UK(BD), 5 yrs |
Here's another thread http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/posts/209087/0
"If no sexual offence is being committed it seems very odd indeed that there should be an offence for having an image of something which was not an offence," Lord Wallace of Tankerness | ||
| 29 May 09, 1:43 AM BigOldHector UK(DE), 10 yrs |
Oddly enough, so do I and have never criticised it in this context. But not disapproving of something in principle doesn't oblige me or anyone else to accept absolutely anything however reprehensible that goes on in its name, as some seem to insist whenever I deplore specific actions by individuals. I AM THE GOD OF HELL-FIRE!.....but its my lunch break right now | ||
| 29 May 09, 8:10 AM lisal 8 yrs |
As I've said elsewhere not accepting and condemning are two different things. Personally, I find the thought of scat absolutely revolting but I would not going around saying "scat is disgusting and not BDSM" just because it doesn't fit in with the way my BDSM is | ||
| 29 May 09, 8:37 AM sardax UK, 6 yrs |
An awful lot of reprehensible action goes on under the cover of a respectable name-religion or art for example. There always will be some debasing the coinage of any activity. Religion aside, I can't rail against all the excrement I see paraded around as " Art"-or I could, but in the end, only I would get a headache and a bitter attitude. If some practitioners of Findom are "vile" then that's just the way of the world, but with some others it works. They have the wherewithal to make it happen and both parties enjoy the psychological buzz. Just because some turn it into a $$ making machine does not lessen the psychological dynamic which some find so appealing. Rail against it by all means but it will get branded as domination none the less, and sadly so few find the Holy Grail they have set up for themselves that anything resembling a chalice becomes attractive. |
