You are viewing IC as Guest    
Why not the site? It's free!
   
If you're already a member, it's better if you

Page: 1 2

Is 24/7 D/s actually slavery? (12)

The_Slave_Forum's profile . The_Slave_Forum group posts

x_Thunder_x
Posted by x_Thunder_x on Sun 3 May 09, 1:08 AM to the The_Slave_Forum group.

I own leashed cougar & gal rosa

leashed cougar is my slave - gal rosa says she is my submissive

yet

next week leashed cougar will have my collar locked onto her and gal rosa already wears a symbolic necklace every day

Both are 24/7 (we don't live together though we see/stay with each other a few times every week currently and talk every day) in that even when not with me they both consider themselves owned.

Often in a D/s relationship there is not that perpetual contact

leashed cougar knows she can never walk away from me, gal rosa says she "thinks" she can't either

So is 24/7 D/s actually slavery?

Edited Sun 3 May 09, 1:23 AM by x_Thunder_x

Replies

3 May 09, 9:11 AM
x_flaire_x
UK(OX), 10 yrs
x_Thunder_x wrote:

So is 24/7 D/s actually slavery?

From an entirely personal perspective, I have to say, for me, no. Altheus and I live together and certainly exist within the 24/7 D/s lifestyle.

He is the head of the household. I obey him. However, it is my choice to do so. I have a safe word which I can use not only in play, but in the decision process of the house. Saying that, I hadn't used the safeword in either context for a number of years - but it still exists. We live for the mutual pursuit of pleasure that reflects our different needs.

We have a 'fetish' traditional marriage. Of course, I'm sure Rad Fems would argue that all marriage is slavery.

There is a place between D/s and M/s which I feel I inhabit - lets call it The Flaire Zone. There are aspects of both camps in my lifestyle because I have freedom of choice yet my obedience is entirely encompassing.

:-)

f x

Cookie Monster In Bondage!
Any posts made between the hours of 2am and 6am are the product of a drink-addled, sleep-deprived mind and hence don't count. Thank you.

3 May 09, 9:31 AM
Adverse_Camber
UK, 3 yrs

The Flaire Zone...i love that! i think it pinpoints again, how individual our interpretations of these terms are...

However, i do feel that there are some distinct differences between slavery and submission and where i always get to is the element of choice.

i think that a slave submits only once...when "agreeing" to enslavement; that being the last choice that can be made until release by the Owner.

A submissive retains choice i believe and consciously submits again and again, renegotiating boundaries.

i THINK, and this is merely my opinion, that in a D/s relationship it is the relationship itself that is in constant flux, whereas in a M/s relationship, the only flux is the individuals' personality dynamics...i.e. the natural changes we go through as time goes by.

Both types of relationship require work and care, an unhappy slave is no good to anyone, but within D/s the Owner works with the submissive, although always in control. In M/s, the Owner needs to care for, but not consult, the slave.

Whew, long-winded and just my opinions...hope they make some sense!

Have you ever looked fear in the face and said i just don't care? It's only half past the point of no return...the Thunder before the lightning, the breath before the phrase (Pink)

3 May 09, 9:46 AM
CommanderBondage
3 yrs
Interesting question so I looked up the definition of slavery and it is as follows quoted from Wikipedia :

"Slavery is a form of forced labor in which people are considered to be, or treated as, the property of others. Slaves are held against their will from the time of their capture, purchase or birth, and are deprived of the right to leave, to refuse to work, or to receive compensation (such as wages)"

It would therfore seem to me that to encompass the true definition of the word the following criteria would have to be met.

1. Forced labour without reward

2. To become the legal property of another person or persons, (I expect this could be with or without consent)

3. To be held captive

Sounds great to me........anyone up for it ??? :)

3 May 09, 12:00 PM
jules9
UK(CH), 3 yrs

leashed_cougar wrote:
The Flaire Zone...i love that! i think it pinpoints again, how individual our interpretations of these terms are...

However, i do feel that there are some distinct differences between slavery and submission and where i always get to is the element of choice.

i think that a slave submits only once...when "agreeing" to enslavement; that being the last choice that can be made until release by the Owner.

A submissive retains choice i believe and consciously submits again and again, renegotiating boundaries.

i THINK, and this is merely my opinion, that in a D/s relationship it is the relationship itself that is in constant flux, whereas in a M/s relationship, the only flux is the individuals' personality dynamics...i.e. the natural changes we go through as time goes by.

Both types of relationship require work and care, an unhappy slave is no good to anyone, but within D/s the Owner works with the submissive, although always in control. In M/s, the Owner needs to care for, but not consult, the slave.

Whew, long-winded and just my opinions...hope they make some sense!

This sums it up for me entirely.

And yet, I still feel "owned", I am his do to as he pleases with. I have a safe word, but would hate to use it. I am still building trust, and until that is absolute, I doubt I could ever be his slave, and yet I am his completely and utterly. The more I think about it, the more confused I get - I suppose I just never saw myself as "slave material", Daddy is proving this is an option for me though.

I love the dynamic we have, does being "his lil one" preclude me from being his slave? I would hate to give up this dynamic, yet there are times when nothing would make me happier than to give up everything and be there for him 24/7, to serve him in each and every way. Although if I am honest, I would probably only last a week!!!

The question on the boards has really messed with my head, about selling slaves. I doubt I could ever allow this, which makes me think maybe I could never be a slave. I can see myself eventually doing ANYTHING to serve him, but for me slavery in this context is about choosing your master. And that's something I could never give up control of...

XxX

3 May 09, 12:36 PM
x_Thunder_x
UK(E), 9 yrs


jules9 wrote:
I love the dynamic we have, does being "his lil one" preclude me from being his slave? I would hate to give up this dynamic, yet there are times when nothing would make me happier than to give up everything and be there for him 24/7, to serve him in each and every way. Although if I am honest, I would probably only last a week!!!

The question on the boards has really messed with my head, about selling slaves. I doubt I could ever allow this, which makes me think maybe I could never be a slave. I can see myself eventually doing ANYTHING to serve him, but for me slavery in this context is about choosing your master. And that's something I could never give up control of...

XxX

I am both leashed cougar and gal rosa's Daddy as well as being their Master - I see no contradiction in that.

Though I've heard of selling slaves in the US I've never come across it in the UK

^Thunder^
Owner of my "2 subs in a cubicle" gal rosa and leashed cougar
The Slave Forum

3 May 09, 5:21 PM
Adverse_Camber
UK, 3 yrs

i was re-reading all this and thinking about objectification...if you take slavery at its most basic, as per CommanderBondage's definition and explanation above, a slave would need to be seen not only as a possession, but an object too.

So an Owner would have to dehumanise the slave to attain "pure" slavery...and then, the slave object COULD arguably be sold, passed on, truly owned...

i think this is possibly why the concept of slavery freaks some out, because this would be taking it to its extreme...and i guess *most* of us would rather be treated as individual human beings...at least some of the time!

Have you ever looked fear in the face and said i just don't care? It's only half past the point of no return...the Thunder before the lightning, the breath before the phrase (Pink)

3 May 09, 6:50 PM
jules9
UK(CH), 3 yrs

Tanos posted something on the other thread that actually really summed it up for me, that slavery in this context is through a bond, once that bond is broken, then the very thing that made them a slave is also gone.

(Forgive the paraphrasing, and if I ever learn to do a cool linky type thing, I will do, but until then reading his words really helped clear it up in my head).

Jules XxX

3 May 09, 7:05 PM
Iphis_me
UK(E), 4 yrs

jules9 wrote:
The more I think about it, the more confused I get - I suppose I just never saw myself as "slave material", Daddy is proving this is an option for me though.

Very similar to where I am. Thunder and I have been discussing it this afternoon - and beyond a certain point it really doesn't matter what label you put on it as that is just words. I feel owned, I feel that I cannot leave him, I am proud to belong to him, my primary motivation is to please him. I feel a sense of peace in knowing my place - last week when I was having a stressful couple of days he came over one evening, and thanks to half an hour sitting at his feet I felt so much better..........

I never expected this, I really didn't. When I met him almost a year ago I considered myself more a masochistic bottom than anything else, and sometimes the depth of my submission, how much it means to me, scares the living daylights out of me!!!

"That hurts......please don't stop!"

3 May 09, 9:10 PM
misfit
UK, 3 yrs
leashed_cougar wrote:
The Flaire Zone...i love that! i think it pinpoints again, how individual our interpretations of these terms are...

However, i do feel that there are some distinct differences between slavery and submission and where i always get to is the element of choice.

i think that a slave submits only once...when "agreeing" to enslavement; that being the last choice that can be made until release by the Owner.

A submissive retains choice i believe and consciously submits again and again, renegotiating boundaries.

i THINK, and this is merely my opinion, that in a D/s relationship it is the relationship itself that is in constant flux, whereas in a M/s relationship, the only flux is the individuals' personality dynamics...i.e. the natural changes we go through as time goes by.

Both types of relationship require work and care, an unhappy slave is no good to anyone, but within D/s the Owner works with the submissive, although always in control. In M/s, the Owner needs to care for, but not consult, the slave.

Whew, long-winded and just my opinions...hope they make some sense!

To answer the question no I do not think it is slavery, because if I compare to the traditional definition I would like to think people are not held against their will, but have entered a form of contract voluntarily, whether written or enforced via repetitive behaviour, which is frequently invoked in contract law.

I may have my membership revoked when I say this, but I do not consider myself a slave for the reasons clearly outlined above. I consider myself submissive as the retention of choice is important to me though never having been in a full D/s relationship I am not sure how much choice I would truly be allowed to retain. I tried to mould a previous relationship in this way but failed miserably.

For these reasons I do not think I can ever be 'owned' as a slave as I need independence. If I am ever owned I can say now the Lady will have to be very special indeed but for now submission is where my interests lie.

M

Space travels in my blood. And there ain't nothing I can do about it.
Now I know I'm being used but that's okay cause I like the abuse.
I can resist everything except temptation.
It's always funny until someone gets hurt and then it's just hilarious.
Cake or Death?

3 May 09, 10:43 PM
The_Slave_Forum
UK, 3 yrs
misfit wrote:

I may have my membership revoked when I say this, but I do not consider myself a slave for the reasons clearly outlined above.

M

Hi M! Just wanted to clarify that absolutely no-one will "have their membership revoked" for expressing their opinions. In fact, this would all get yawningly boring very quickly if we all felt exactly the same!

The only reason anyone would be removed from the network on here would be if they were personally attacking someone, as this is envisaged as a space where we can be open about our thoughts, however bizarre they may seem to others. Respect being the key, which you always seem to display x

Next page

This is the standard version
©1997-2012 Informed Consent
UK map

UK Map

UK listings
Clubs
Munches
Groups
Dungeon Hire
Services
Kink-friendly
Shops
Other countries
Dictionary
BDSM
Fetish
Top
Bottom
Bondage
Dominant
Submissive
RACK vs SSC
Top Pictures
Rate the pictures

Top BDSM Books
The Story of O
Showing you the Ropes
Female Domination
The Ethical Slut
The Human Pony

More sites
IC's advertisers
BDSM Rights
Kink.com
Kink Podcasts
The Slave Register
Ownership & Possession

Help & About IC