This post is on the D/s & M/s web board.
| Mon 20 Apr 09, 11:33 AM ThedaVamp UK, 6 yrs |
I must be the worst domme evah. I can't imagine having the time or the mental capacity to have total control over someone 24 hours a day. I had a part time LOL live in slave once and I honestly couldn't handle the effort involved in keeping them busy. Ok so I managed to find enough tasks to fill their days as well as mine, but to tell you the truth, it wasn't erotic in the slightest. Convenient in many ways, handy - yes - it was like having a spare arm and someone to wait in post office queues whilst I got other stuff done. But then I'm a busy girl. I suppose I wanted invisible support in the most selfish of ways - here's a list of tasks - do it. I don't want to make the time to talk to you, interact with you. I just want my stuff done, done well, now piss off and don't make any demands of me. I get exhausted simply reading about Dom/mes who have the time and the energy to control their sub's emails, read their journals, daily routine, performance, wanking schedule, diet etc. and then sex??? Jeebus and Pinky, they must have extra brain capacity that I can't access and extra hours in the day. How do you do it? Taking someone's minutae everyday needs and requirements along with your own? Please check your irony levels before attempting to respond to the majority of my posts. | |
| 20 Apr 09, 11:52 AM Ms_Valentine UK, 3 yrs |
Who says that is what TPE has to be like? I have a TPE relationship with my sub and we set up rules when we started out, added a few and apart from that the whole relationship just ticks along without a great deal of exhausting effort on either part. I don't control his e-mails, his diet ( beyond requiring that he doesn't eat meat or drink too much alcohol), have a journal system, or anything that requires big time effort on my part. I have a sub who agreed when we got together to do whatever I wanted to the best of his ability, to obey me, and devote his life to my comfort and happiness. That is just how it is. If he breaks any of the rules or misbehaves he gets punished but that is rare. He knows what he must or must not do and for him, being mine, means he keeps to the rules. I am not required to constantly be checking over him like a child. TPE does not have to mean micromanagement. Thank Goodness!!!
24/7 subs and slaves can and do live similar lives, it is only the concept of 'ownership' which separates them. | |
| 20 Apr 09, 12:28 PM ClassAct2005 UK(N), 7 yrs |
It's like most sex - an issue of compatibilty. You make time for what you need to do and if you aren't interested you don't do it. If you really need it you can't not do it but even if you do need it obviously people have to lead their lives in the meantime so it may mentally be 24/7 but the instructions or rules might be throughout the day spasmodically or whatever is necessary to remind her of her place etc. | |
| 20 Apr 09, 12:30 PM Belasarius UK(M), 8 yrs |
For me, it is relatively simple in principle. I only ask her to be the best she can be for me - to observe me and my desires and needs and to meet them (whenever she can, to anticipate them). She should do this by disregarding her own needs, safe in the knowledge that I will be taking care of her.
In practice, this means I am never going to get the domestic menial many male subs seem to wish to be (as indicated by the OP - and good for them If I want someone who takes pains to look gorgeous at the drop of a hat, then she needs the time to paint her nails or shave her fanny - which means I end up doing the washing up (not all the time I hasten to add). So - for me, and mine, power exchange is not about who does what, it is all about her realisation that her sole function is to make me happy - and that she should not waste a second worrying about her happiness: for that is MY business. Patience is bitter - but its fruit is sweet. Edited 20 Apr 09, 12:31 PM by Belasarius | |
| 20 Apr 09, 12:51 PM Captain_Jack UK(CR), 5 yrs |
There's really not all that much to it. Once you've established a set of rules and regulations, standing orders and routines the amount of supervision required reduces substantially. Then spot checks will suffice and you can allow some of your time/attention be used on other aspects/projects. And of course when standards slip you need to bring the hammer down. But horses for courses. I delight in control first and foremost. Not everyone is a control freak. Your Captain Jack
| |
| 20 Apr 09, 4:39 PM Red_Spark UK(LE), 5 yrs |
It's about having the power to control, not necessarily choosing to exercise that all the time. Or maybe I don't express myself very well, but not about micro-management. If your sub has an intellect - use it! They should be making your life easier, not harder. "Be quiet and come with me. I won't betray you." | |
| 21 Apr 09, 6:34 PM boiata UK, 10 yrs |
You may need to read this: http://www.play.com/Books/Books/4-/375625/The-On... Nothing to do with controlling relationships, but vital for any manager. |