You are viewing IC as Guest    
Why not the site? It's free!
   
If you're already a member, it's better if you

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Attraction, compatibility and posting history? (72)

This post is on the Other BDSM web board.

7 Nov 08, 2:18 PM
Jahc99
UK, 5 yrs
Backdooruk wrote:
I wonder whether there might be a male/female plausible deniability aspect to this, where women prefer a different excuse to attraction when they approach someone?

Man: "Nice arse. Fancy a shag?"

Women: "I really liked your post on the bank's response to the credit crunch" (thinks: 'nice arse, I wonder if they fancy a shag?')

:-D

- Chris

Yeah, sounds about right! And 'Will you be my mentor...?' usually means more than that too!

Why poison your liver when I could eat it for you?

7 Nov 08, 2:25 PM
twisted_kitty
UK(OX), 4 yrs

Jahc99 wrote:
Backdooruk wrote:
I wonder whether there might be a male/female plausible deniability aspect to this, where women prefer a different excuse to attraction when they approach someone?

Man: "Nice arse. Fancy a shag?"

Women: "I really liked your post on the bank's response to the credit crunch" (thinks: 'nice arse, I wonder if they fancy a shag?')

:-D

- Chris

Yeah, sounds about right! And 'Will you be my mentor...?' usually means more than that too!

You really think that?? :-D OK initial attraction is important ... but you would not get together with some one if the chemistry was not right? So posting introduces you to an online persona to the point of meeting the person in the flesh. If I liked some ones arse I would just tell them I would not use there posts as excuse to contact them.

Life is a biatch ... fuck her dont take her too seriously but love her with all your heart!
comments are always edited cause i is a typo princess innit though ... am i bothered :-D :-D :-D :-D

7 Nov 08, 2:25 PM
mq1965
UK(DA), 8 yrs
Backdooruk wrote:
mq1965 wrote:
You can probably get a good idea about some who will definitely not be compatible with you from their posts, but only a clue as to who is likely to be compatible.

Why do you think that?

- Chris

As a general rule I find it quite easy to be sure when I know someone isn't right for me, but much harder to be sure they are. I'm certainly not saying that I can always, or even mostly, be sure someone isn't right for me from their posts, but there are some things people can say and do which can make me sure that I would not find them right for me in a long term relationship.

Maybe it depends what you are looking for in a relationship, but there are some things a person could say and do which would make me sure they weren't right for me. Not to say I wouldn't like them, or find them interesting, just to say I am sure they wouldn't be compatible with me in a serious relationship.

I don't want to make too big a thing of this, though, as it would sound like I am rejecting hundreds of people on relatively spurious grounds. I said it was something you could sometimes tell from people's posts, not something I frequently read into them.

7 Nov 08, 2:32 PM
Lee_Van_Spunkenfrick
3 yrs
i only look at the pictures ... if there are no pics or just a pic of an eyeball or a fat arse then i don't even bother with the regardless of how good it may be.

of course if the pictures are nice then i will read the rest .. posting history is prety irrelevant

all for one and fuck the rest

7 Nov 08, 2:41 PM
Jahc99
UK, 5 yrs
twisted_kitty wrote:

Yeah, sounds about right! And 'Will you be my mentor...?' usually means more than that too!

You really think that?? :-D OK initial attraction is important ... but you would not get together with some one if the chemistry was not right? So posting introduces you to an online persona to the point of meeting the person in the flesh. If I liked some ones arse I would just tell them I would not use there posts as excuse to contact them. [/quote]

I'm not cynical, I've just been doing this a while! As with all things, I advocate openness and honesty.

Why poison your liver when I could eat it for you?

7 Nov 08, 2:46 PM
Backdooruk
UK(BA), 12 yrs
mq1965 wrote:
As a general rule I find it quite easy to be sure when I know someone isn't right for me, but much harder to be sure they are. I'm certainly not saying that I can always, or even mostly, be sure someone isn't right for me from their posts, but there are some things people can say and do which can make me sure that I would not find them right for me in a long term relationship.

I think there are two things about that:

1) Its an inevitable logical result starting off from a default position that everyone is suitable and looking to see who isn't rather than the opposite way around: I suspect anyone actively searching would do it like that

2) I wonder if there might be a cognitive bias going on here? I can think of several that might apply, the most obvious being the fundamental attribution error (the tendency to attribute situational behaviors to personality).

- Chris

Anyone with a brain is manipulable. Only the truly unimaginative are difficult to control.

7 Nov 08, 2:56 PM
naughty_chicken
4 yrs
I'd hate to be judged by my posts on this WEBSITE. I'm not the best scribe in the ic world but in real life im genuinely a funny chap to be around and very attractive.
7 Nov 08, 3:11 PM
Xx_Rob_V_xX
UK(MK), 3 yrs
This thread is seriously starting to concern me. All this talk about it being a feminine trait to check people's posting history before contacting them.

I've just had to stick my hand down to check the old meat and two veg are still there!

I'd say 90%+ of the memo's I've sent to people have been as a result of seeing something they've posted that has caught my interest, and therefore made me interested in them.

Of the remainder, I've certainly checked out their posting history before memoing anyway.

It's SO easy to write a profile that you think will appeal to your target audience, and because it's so easy I think it can be abused. A good posting history though, is much more difficult to fake, and I think it tells you much more about a person.

Sure, if you just want a random shag, go for pretty pictures. If you want much more than that though, surely it pays to try and find something out about the object of your desires, their personality and likes and dislikes, before you contact them on the basis of what could be completely the wrong impression.

7 Nov 08, 3:12 PM
Lee_Van_Spunkenfrick
3 yrs
i do, however, think that you can tell a lot from what or how people write either in posts or a profile.

all for one and fuck the rest

7 Nov 08, 3:20 PM
Ms_Tytania
7 yrs
Sonny2point0 wrote:
I'd hate to be judged by my posts on this WEBSITE. I'm not the best scribe in the ic world but in real life im genuinely a funny chap to be around and very attractive.

That's all very well, but how big is your cock? :-D

I'm a Genuine Fake.

Next page

This is the standard version
©1997-2012 Informed Consent
UK map

UK Map

UK listings
Clubs
Munches
Groups
Dungeon Hire
Services
Kink-friendly
Shops
Other countries
Dictionary
BDSM
Fetish
Top
Bottom
Bondage
Dominant
Submissive
RACK vs SSC
Top Pictures
Rate the pictures

Top BDSM Books
The Story of O
Showing you the Ropes
Female Domination
The Ethical Slut
The Human Pony

More sites
IC's advertisers
BDSM Rights
Kink.com
Kink Podcasts
The Slave Register
Ownership & Possession

Help & About IC