Michelle - Woman E Pro Domme? (77)

26 Jul 08, 11:04 AM
bbcboy
UK, 7 yrs
I am a little confused as to why the lady involved is still reffered to as Lady or Woman E. Max was obviously named and shamed, but the 'culprit' of the piece is not. I think most people who have anything of a intrest in this know who were involved, but what I am asking is, why are they still reffered to by initials A , B, C, D, and E ?

26 Jul 08, 11:07 AM
lisal
5 yrs
Anita_Esrader wrote:
How can ANYONE trust visiting a Pro domme now that this has happened...She has done the scene and Pro Dommes in particular, no favours whatsoever.
A question for you Anita
If, say, someone on IC or from a munch outed someone else from IC or a munch would you not trust anyone else on IC or that munch?
Lots of ICs and munches in there but I hope you get my drift

26 Jul 08, 11:09 AM
MistressLadyAnna
UK(BD), 2 yrs£

bbcboy wrote:
I am a little confused as to why the lady involved is still reffered to as Lady or Woman E. Max was obviously named and shamed, but the 'culprit' of the piece is not. I think most people who have anything of a intrest in this know who were involved, but what I am asking is, why are they still reffered to by initials A , B, C, D, and E ?
Probably because everyone knows who they are, they being Women A B C D and E. Refer to them by their real names and nobody knows who you mean.
E has been named.
The other women shouldn't be named as they are innocent. I hope they are never named and I think we should all respect that.

"If no sexual offence is being committed it seems very odd indeed that there should be an offence for having an image of something which was not an offence," Lord Wallace of Tankerness
http://www.ladyanna.co.uk/

26 Jul 08, 11:16 AM
bbcboy
UK, 7 yrs

MistressLadyAnna wrote:

bbcboy wrote:
I am a little confused as to why the lady involved is still reffered to as Lady or Woman E. Max was obviously named and shamed, but the 'culprit' of the piece is not. I think most people who have anything of a intrest in this know who were involved, but what I am asking is, why are they still reffered to by initials A , B, C, D, and E ?
Probably because everyone knows who they are, they being Women A B C D and E. Refer to them by their real names and nobody knows who you mean.
E has been named.
The other women shouldn't be named as they are innocent. I hope they are never named and I think we should all respect that.
Thanks for your reply Lady Anna, I hadn't realise Woman E had been named, was this her real name or her pro name that everyone knows her as ?

26 Jul 08, 11:17 AM
Anita_Esrader
UK, 3 yrs

lisal wrote:

Anita_Esrader wrote:
How can ANYONE trust visiting a Pro domme now that this has happened...She has done the scene and Pro Dommes in particular, no favours whatsoever.
A question for you Anita
If, say, someone on IC or from a munch outed someone else from IC or a munch would you not trust anyone else on IC or that munch?
Lots of ICs and munches in there but I hope you get my drift

I trust my loyal friends with whom I have built up a relationship over several years.
But I get your point.. What I was trying to say was that Mistress E, A or call her whatever you wish, betrayed confidences and did no favours.
If such a thing were to happen at a munch or on IC, then I presume the same would occur, in that people may or may not be put off from IC or the munch.
This event is topical, at the moment. In my view, MM has, in his own way, done our scene a lot of favours wherease Madam E has done nothing but cause damage.
In a few weeks, MM will be remembered, but all the news will be fish and chip paper. Madam E will be forgotten and will be in the ignore category.

I am gonna be a bride and a groom, but on two different days.
DATE to be announced..

26 Jul 08, 11:21 AM
MistressLadyAnna
UK(BD), 2 yrs£

bbcboy wrote:

MistressLadyAnna wrote:

bbcboy wrote:
I am a little confused as to why the lady involved is still reffered to as Lady or Woman E. Max was obviously named and shamed, but the 'culprit' of the piece is not. I think most people who have anything of a intrest in this know who were involved, but what I am asking is, why are they still reffered to by initials A , B, C, D, and E ?
Probably because everyone knows who they are, they being Women A B C D and E. Refer to them by their real names and nobody knows who you mean.
E has been named.
The other women shouldn't be named as they are innocent. I hope they are never named and I think we should all respect that.
Thanks for your reply Lady Anna, I hadn't realise Woman E had been named, was this her real name or her pro name that everyone knows her as ?

Her real first name. As far as I am aware her pro name hasn't been revealed - not that this matters any more. I very much doubt that she will ever be open for business again.

"If no sexual offence is being committed it seems very odd indeed that there should be an offence for having an image of something which was not an offence," Lord Wallace of Tankerness
http://www.ladyanna.co.uk/

26 Jul 08, 1:26 PM
The_Inner_Whore
UK(E), 3 yrs

Master_Craftsman wrote:
Apart from Mr E possibly being stupid (and he would have needed to be quite remarkably stupid) it does seem a damn silly thing for an MI5 goon to have done. Assuming he could still tie his own shoe laces, did he not realise that going to the yellow press like that could (and probably would) have cost him his job?
Quoting for the interview on Times online:
" I didn't think about what I was doing. I was stupid, naive.�
I'd have thought that anyone with one healthy brain cell left to share between two brains, would have given the original plan at least five minutes thought before putting it into action. But not them. It beggars belief!
Cultivate your inner whore
Edited 26 Jul 08, 1:29 PM by The_Inner_Whore

26 Jul 08, 1:28 PM
The_Inner_Whore
UK(E), 3 yrs

Anita_Esrader wrote:
How can ANYONE trust visiting a Pro domme now that this has happened...She has done the scene and Pro Dommes in particular, no favours whatsoever.
Please Anita. You know pro-Dommes personally, tou should know better than to dump us all in the same bag. Treat us as individuals, with very different lifestyles, expectations, sets of values and morals.
Cultivate your inner whore

26 Jul 08, 1:29 PM
extremophile
UK, 4 mths

Ms_Tytania wrote:
I'd have thought that anyone one one healthy brain cell left to share between two brains, would have given the original plan at least five minutes thought before putting it into action. But not them. It beggars belief!
It does indeed beggar belief. That's why I don't believe it.

26 Jul 08, 1:36 PM
BarbieSlutLoki
UK, 3 yrs
She was a professional who betrayed her clients trust in her, I think she should be named and shamed in a tabloid so that no one else is outed by her
Perhaps the NOTW can oblige...
Live by the sword die by the sword

The first rule of Brat Club, we don't talk about Brat Club...
Neque porro quisquam est qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit...

Next page


	©1997-2008 Informed Consent