 |
 |
 |
|
Informed Consent
8 Jan 2009, 2:42 AM GMT
You are
Main page
Help&About
 Donate!
Web Boards
-
Discussions about BDSM and IC
Help forum
Weblogs
-
Including
write-ups
and
groups
UK map
-
Local topics
Chatrooms
-
Talk live to other people
UK listings
- including:
Event Dates,
Clubs,
Munches,
Groups,
Websites,
Services,
Shops
-
Other countries
Dictionary
-
BDSM,
Fetish,
etc
The Mistress Index
Personal Ads
-
including UK
M4f,
M4m,
F4m,
F4f,
m4F,
m4M,
f4M,
f4F
The BDSM Book List,
Seek Discipline!,
The Slave Register,
BDSM in Manchester,
International Fetish
Day
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
IC : Web boards : BDSM Activism : "Illegal Image?"
Illegal Image? (7)
This post is on the BDSM Activism web board.
Mon 2 Jun 08, 5:28 PM
Skylon
UK, 5 yrs
|
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/06/02/bullfigh... -------------------
[-_-] Ohmmmmmmmm
|
2 Jun 08, 5:30 PM
Grissom
UK(PR), 20 mths
|
It looks like a drawing.... so probably not yet... Better to be a diamond with a flaw then a pebble with none
Assumption is the mother of all cockups 
"There are two paths you can go by, but in the long run, there's still time to change the road you're on..." Stairway to Heaven
|
2 Jun 08, 5:37 PM
Skylon
UK, 5 yrs
|
It's a 'relistic depiction' (enhanced photograph) of a naked woman getting some serious injuries (in the name or animal welfare) so falls well into range for getting viewers into trouble. -------------------
[-_-] Ohmmmmmmmm
|
2 Jun 08, 5:42 PM
Dimswitch3
UK, 2 yrs |
Skylon wrote:
It's a 'relistic depiction' (enhanced photograph) of a naked woman getting some serious injuries (in the name or animal welfare) so falls well into range for getting viewers into trouble.
|
it's not for sexual arousal though. However stick a thumbnail of a page 3 picture in the corner and it will be illegal
|
2 Jun 08, 5:47 PM
Skylon
UK, 5 yrs
|
If it's not intended to be sexually arousing why is the model naked and glam?
I think if you did a photoshopped version of the picture with the (dang, can't remember what they're called) stabby things removed and went round asking people if the image was sexually arousing then 90 odd percent would say that yes it was mildly arousing. -------------------
[-_-] Ohmmmmmmmm
Edited 2 Jun 08, 5:48 PM by Skylon
|
2 Jun 08, 5:47 PM
Summon_her
UK(GU), 3 yrs
|
Dimswitch3 wrote:
Skylon wrote:
It's a 'relistic depiction' (enhanced photograph) of a naked woman getting some serious injuries (in the name or animal welfare) so falls well into range for getting viewers into trouble.
|
it's not for sexual arousal though. However stick a thumbnail of a page 3 picture in the corner and it will be illegal
|
Oh this can run and run and is probably a good example of how confusing the new law is. It's a naked woman in what I would call, an erotic pose. So, lets assume it is a photo, at what point does this image definatively fall into, or out of scope of the new law? |
2 Jun 08, 5:47 PM
DeadlyDesire
UK(TW), 2 yrs
Y!
|
Well if you read the article the photo is real but the arrows are digitally put in after........ Makes a good point though.....
xXx DD xXx |
2 Jun 08, 5:50 PM
Dimswitch3
UK, 2 yrs |
DeadlyDesire wrote:
Well if you read the article the photo is real but the arrows are digitally put in after........ Makes a good point though.....
xXx DD xXx
|
No pun intended of course.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
