This post is on the Other BDSM web board.
| Wed 23 Apr 08, 7:19 PM slave_vs UK(TQ), 5 yrs   |
Following on from the last discussion ,what do subs think about being branded/marked if there Mistress/Masters request you to have it done for them. Be careful for what you wish for it might come true! | |
| 23 Apr 08, 7:27 PM pureheart UK(LS), 5 yrs |
Having a permanent mark or brand isn't needed to show ownership, that is totally a personal preferance. He has never asked for, and I know that He never would ask for anything permanent. I am a 24/7 submissive to my Dom and we live together as a couple and a family, a brand or mark isn't necessary to show anyone His ownership of me ... hopefully anyone that has contact with us can see that in our actions and relationship. I know I belong to Him, no need for any brand or mark. My collaring was all that was needed to seal our relationship, and that is as permanent as any brand or mark ... our bond. pure x edited for grammar ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Edited 23 Apr 08, 7:30 PM by pureheart | |
| 23 Apr 08, 7:45 PM RubberPrincess UK(TW), 5 yrs |
Personally if Sir had His own way then i would by know how a sun tattooed around my ring piece "sun shines out of my ass", i love my tattoos and would love more. i do not however fancy a tattoo around that part of my anatomy. However i have currently started to design a tattoo to place in an area that will be for just He and i. Whether of not He decides this is what He wants is another thing.
i would dearly love to wear His amrk upon my skin in the form of a tattoo, not soo keen on the branding aspect. As above i do not believe that you need to have a mark to prove submission or even devotion to another. i would never choose or allow a man to put His name upon my body but i would allow this Man to put a symbol on my body or whever else He should wish...just not delicate bottom parts!!!! xXx DD xXx | |
| 23 Apr 08, 8:19 PM P_and_s 6 yrs |
I have my Masters initials on my bum...a tattoo.
Thats the only one he will let me have. susieslave To grow old is mandatory. To grow up is optional | |
| 23 Apr 08, 8:33 PM silaster UK, 8 yrs |
I love tattoos. With a past owner we discussed branding, in view of how everything ended I am very glad we did not take that route. With my Master we have discussed tattoos, I would like something pretty but showed his ownership, we are now talking about designs but when it will happen...goodness knows. If I had the courage I would like to be branded | |
| 23 Apr 08, 8:47 PM MasterVilosSlave UK(CB), 6 yrs |
would be happier with a tattoo, but would say yes to a brand (not that I'd have a choice)... would be very very scared though - burning is a little fear of mine. That which does not kill us, makes us stranger... | |
| 23 Apr 08, 9:13 PM just_the_two_of_us 5 yrs |
I have his tattoo on my left arm, says obedience and slave and stuff on it, for all the world to see if I have short sleeves on, [not something I would suggest for anyone unless they knew that the relationship was the one and no one or anything would stop it at all] I enjoyed being tattooed, but I don't think I would enjoy branding, we have talked about it, but that's as far as it went, more tattoo's yes, branding, no, not for me anyway. slave | |
| 23 Apr 08, 10:04 PM MasterJsGift 5 yrs |
I have a tattoo on my bum with Master J's written around top, still debating what to add to it Lyn x | |
| 23 Apr 08, 10:17 PM sapphogirl NL, 4 yrs £ |
I think a brand is better in some ways as its really affects the slaves mind, but for some slaves it is a dream come true but some subs may wish a tat , i guess it depends on first, this is not a temp thing so is the Mistress/Master /slave/sub relationship going to last ? and second is the person a slave or sub ? as a slave is property there is a saying
"The brand is used primarily, oddly enough, because of its reputed psychological effect. In theory, if not in practice, when the slave branded like an animal, finds fair skin marked by the iron of a master, she cannot fail, somehow, in the deepest levels of thought, to regard self as something which is owned, as mere property, as something belonging to the brute who has put the burning iron to thigh. Most simply the brand is supposed to convince the slave is truly owned; it is supposed to make feel owned. When the iron is pulled away and the slave pain and degradation and smells the odor of burnt flesh, is supposed to tell them uderstanding its full and terrible import, I AM HER'S " yes I have changed this quote to make it for male and female slaves "But who is stronger, truly, I asked myself, She who continues to wound and bleed himself to please others, or She who refuses any longer to do so?" |
