You are viewing IC as Guest    
Why not the site? It's free!
   
If you're already a member, it's better if you

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Theory: Why Dommes are scarce. (93)

This post is on the Other BDSM web board.

21 Feb 08, 7:15 PM
IndelibleMarker
UK(E), 6 yrs


These are really rough figures, but they are based on the number of subs, Doms, slaves and switches of each gender (Trans and couples not included) online in the last hour according to Collarme.com (I know collarme is terrible, but it's easier to count the numbers on and should still give a rough idea of ratios)

Males:

Dom: 212

Switch: 31

Sub: 178

Slave: 50

Sub & slave combined: 228

Total: 471

Females:

Domme: 55

Switch: 12

Sub: 100

Slave: 21

Sub and slave combined: 121

Total: 188

Therefore;

Dom:Domme = 4.16 : 1

Switch(M):Switch(F) = 2.58 : 1

Sub(M):Sub(F) = 1.88 : 1

Total(M):Total(F) = 2.51 : 1

Dom:sub(F)= 1.75 : 1

Domme:sub(M)= 0.24 : 1

Dom:sub(M) = 0.93 : 1

Domme:sub(F) = 0.45 : 1

I know this doesn't even attempt to answer the OPs question, but it does show that the stats tie up with the theory.

The figure for male Dom vs male sub being relatively close to 1:1 indicates that men are not naturally inclined to one side of the fence, at least strikingly, more than the other.

However, the low value for Domme:sub(F) does give the impression that women are naturally far more inclined to walk the submissive route.

I'm not going to put my balls on the line as to whether that's caused by nature or nurture though!

Tuam matrem feci,
Patrick
IndelibleMarker

Edited 18 Mar 08, 10:47 AM by IndelibleMarker

21 Feb 08, 7:21 PM
TheFalconer
UK(S), 6 yrs

IndelibleMarker wrote:
However, the low value for Domme:sub(F) does give the impression that women are naturally far more inclined to walk the submissive route.

I'm not going to put my balls on the line as to whether that's caused by nature or nurture though!

Given that the stats are from CollarMe, it could well just be caused by men with profiles claiming to be fem subs ;)

"Morality, like art, means drawing a line someplace." - Oscar Wilde

21 Feb 08, 7:47 PM
scott_s
UK(N), 5 yrs

IndelibleMarker wrote:
These are really rough figures, but they are based on the number of subs, Doms, slaves and switches of each gender (Trans and couples not included) online in the last hour according to Collarme.com

very good job, IM!

Edited 21 Feb 08, 7:57 PM by scott_s

21 Feb 08, 7:58 PM
Caringuy
4 yrs
Judging by some other internet sites it seems all roads lead to London and or Midlands. N.Wales/Borders country doesn't seem to exist.

21 Feb 08, 7:58 PM
Priapuss
UK(PO), 4 yrs

Abaddon wrote:
snipped

all subs are worthless. Thats my theory

;)

Have they been devalued on the open market? The credit crunch is really biting hard now. ;-)

Today's the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
Faith is a certainty without evidence, trust is empirical.
www.GiftsLine.com - Discreet & Confidential Picture Framing with Vanilla gifts for vanilla people.

21 Feb 08, 8:05 PM
Tangible
UK, 4 yrs
Deviant_Mind wrote:
Theory: Why Dommes are scarce.

What's your theory?

Oh, the wonderful Bitchy Jones she has a lot to say about this, here:

http://bitchyjones.wordpress.com/2007/09/22/you-...

and all over the rest of her site.

A lot of sense here.

21 Feb 08, 8:05 PM
Elysium
UK(EH), 5 yrs

MsKitti wrote:
If a Domme doesn't "fuck sub men" it doesn't mean it's a bad Domme?

Pure BDSM does not include penetrative sex anyway and Dommes who play on the scene have so many subs I think its' doing everyone good we don't fuck them all!

I meant from the point of view of a primary partner. A Domme by definition has a sub as a primary partner. Those that don't fuck sub men, are bad dommes in my opinion. At least for primary partner material from a sub point of view.

For me, I am mainly attracted to submissive women, therefore I want to fuck them. It stands to reason a straight domme would be attracted to submissive men and want to fuck them.

How many female submissives would view a male dom, who was their primary partner and didn't fuck them as a good dom?

"I don't know what your destiny will be, but one thing I do know: the only ones among you who will be really happy are those who have sought and found how to serve." - Albert Schweitzer.

21 Feb 08, 8:13 PM
sisterhoney61
3 yrs
I spend a lot of time in chat rooms (no, I have no life!) and I've seen the behavior of the male subs in the rooms. They rarely acknowledge anyone else's presence and immediately go for the Dommes. In my regular room there are three Dommes who are regulars, though W/we will get others who come in there from time to time. The male subs whine and beg and plead. Heaven help them if they should PM any of the Dommes without permission. I love it when the Dommes turn on those. When I go into a chat room I try to be polite and respectful to E/everyone there. The male subs who are regulars there are polite and respectful, but the others behave horribly and if the Dommes don't want to talk to them then they get bitchy and mean towards the Dommes. It makes me wonder if these male subs behave the same way IRL as they do in chat.

~~sisterhoney~~

21 Feb 08, 8:13 PM
Elysium
UK(EH), 5 yrs

MissKimberley wrote:
Deviant_Mind wrote:
MissKimberley wrote:
Deviant_Mind wrote:
MissKimberley wrote:
Most good Dommes are in relationships; girls like us don't stay single long nor need to, unless ofcourse they choose to be.

Also, there are just generally fewer dominant women than there are sub men. Supply and demand dictates the market so good Dommes then tend to often get tempted by going pro.

Simple economics really.

I understand there are fewer dominant women. I am interested in theories why that is perceived to be the case.

I personally don't think it's true. I just think the perception is good for business.

So why do you state that they are relatively rare when looking through personals if you don't think it's true?

They are relatively rare when searching through personals.

I think dominant women exist out with the internet and the public scene.

Ahhh ok :) Yes that's very true I think. I know plenty of dominant women who do not identify as such per se. They certainly don't want to strut around in fetishwear, flog their partners, etc. Most male subs will expect this as part of the deal; so if that's not on offer, then perhaps they prefer to search for those women that will do the full monty. And perhaps there aren't enough women into fetishwear, bondage, CP etc; perhaps this is still a man's world; essentially it's still mainly men that buy porn and therefore are exposed more to kinky stuff.

Perhaps also it's a case of how women are raised and also depicted in the media. You're either a good girl (pretty, young, desirable, slim, intelligent, etc) or a bad girl (amy winehouse, britney spears). If young women are expected to look and be like the good girl we see in the media; if the focus on sexuality is only to use it as a bargaining chip in relationships; if we are still being raised with ideals of being good and nice and caring and nurturing... then it is hardly surprising few women will admit to or desire flogging hubby dearest. It's not what good girls do. It would certainly take guts to go against what society expects a good girl to be like.

Or maybe, just maybe, it's just how it is. I don't really have a theory, I don't think it's even really useful to have one as it doesn't change a thing for the male subs out there.

Edited for typos

I think having a valid theory is the first step in changing things. To change things you are in a better position if you understand why things are the way they are.

It is an interesting point you make about the perception people have about BDSM toys, fetish wear etc. I think that a lot of sub males would be happy with someone who just takes charge. The bells and whistles aren't really that important when you get down to it.

Thanks for posing a theory.

"I don't know what your destiny will be, but one thing I do know: the only ones among you who will be really happy are those who have sought and found how to serve." - Albert Schweitzer.

21 Feb 08, 8:24 PM
Kitti_Whitaker
5 yrs
Subs arent always primary relationships, in fact most Dommes on the scene have more than one sub and often none are primaries.

If I have a primary partner, a "boyfriend", I will do whatever we both want, that may still not include penetrative sex, all depends on what is agreed and desired between the parties involved.

Deviant_Mind wrote:
MsKitti wrote:
If a Domme doesn't "fuck sub men" it doesn't mean it's a bad Domme?

Pure BDSM does not include penetrative sex anyway and Dommes who play on the scene have so many subs I think its' doing everyone good we don't fuck them all!

I meant from the point of view of a primary partner. A Domme by definition has a sub as a primary partner. Those that don't fuck sub men, are bad dommes in my opinion. At least for primary partner material from a sub point of view.

For me, I am mainly attracted to submissive women, therefore I want to fuck them. It stands to reason a straight domme would be attracted to submissive men and want to fuck them.

How many female submissives would view a male dom, who was their primary partner and didn't fuck them as a good dom?

Edited 21 Feb 08, 8:26 PM by Kitti_Whitaker

Next page

This is the standard version
©1997-2012 Informed Consent
UK map

UK Map

UK listings
Clubs
Munches
Groups
Dungeon Hire
Services
Kink-friendly
Shops
Other countries
Dictionary
BDSM
Fetish
Top
Bottom
Bondage
Dominant
Submissive
RACK vs SSC
Top Pictures
Rate the pictures

Top BDSM Books
The Story of O
Showing you the Ropes
Female Domination
The Ethical Slut
The Human Pony

UK BDSM Awards 2011

More sites
IC's advertisers
BDSM Rights
Kink Podcasts
The Slave Register
Ownership & Possession

Help & About IC