Posted by feitheachd on Wed 11 Jul 07, 4:03 PM to feitheachd's blog.
As high heels are firmly within my top three obsessions (I'll have to compile a list of my fetishes one of these days, if nothing else it'll help satisfy my list making fetish), I was very interested in this study of how high heels can go.
The basic equation is: H = Q x (12+3S/8), where:
H is the maximum height of the heel in centimetres; Q is a sociological factor with a value between 0 and 1 and S is the shoe size (UK ladies sizes).
The interesting sociological factor Q = Px(Y+9)xL / (T+1)x(A+1)x(Y+10)x(L+£20), where:
P is the probability that wearing the shoes will assist in “pulling” and is measured from 0 to 1; Y is the number of years experience in wearing high heels; L is the cost of the shoes, in pounds; T is the time since the shoe was the height of fashion, in months and A is units of alcohol consumed.
The positive effect of cost and experience on the height of the heel makes sense; however, I don't think that the “pull” factor works. It's the height that influences the chance of “pulling” so it can't really be part of the equation. And even if it's considered purely as an indicator of the objective probability of “pulling” (i.e. 0 if there is no one to see them) it doesn't account for all those woman (and I just know that there are many, many of them) who dress up in the highest heeled boots to strut around on their own, dreaming of males grovelling at their feet.
Also, what is missing is a kinky index. I'd imagine that there should be a more or less direct correlation between kinkiness and maximum heel height.
So, I propose that a more accurate evaluation of Q would be:
Q = Kx(Y+9)xL / (T+1)x(A+1)x(Y+10)x(L+£20), where:
K is the kinkiness factor measured on the Major-Cleaver Index; that is 0.1 if you are John Major and 1.0 if you are Naomi Cleaver.
I wonder if I could get a grant.
Edited Wed 11 Jul 07, 4:05 PM by feitheachd
| 11 Jul 07, 6:42 PM Miss_Namio UK(DT), 5 yrs  |
One factor needs to be added: The quantitative desire of the high-heel wearer to induce jellification in others who may see them. Suggest this is factored as 'P' for Power....
Be good! www.missnamio.moonfruit.com | |
| 11 Jul 07, 7:50 PM electricfog UK, 7 yrs |
I cried when I read this - algebra is, and always has been, a rock-hard limit with me. ef | |
| 11 Jul 07, 8:46 PM houndofhades UK, 5 yrs |
you've only gone and mixed my biggest obsession (heels) with my biggest hatred (maths)  .... *away to find a dark corner to hug my knees and repress this memory*  if you love it, tie it up and spank it.... | |
| 11 Jul 07, 10:46 PM feitheachd 6 yrs |
I was going to use Venn diagrams in my next lesson, I mean weblog, but perhaps I need to rethink. "Treat a man as he is and he will remain as he is. Treat a man as he can and should be, and he will become as he can and should be." ::Johann Wolfgang von Goethe:: | |
| 12 Jul 07, 9:59 AM Miss_Namio UK(DT), 5 yrs |
Secret maledom tendencies?
Be good! www.missnamio.moonfruit.com |
