You are viewing IC as Guest    
Why not the site? It's free!
   
If you're already a member, it's better if you

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Proposal: Glasgow U35 munch. (94)

This post is on the Glasgow (G) topics page and the BDSM Events web board.

24 Jun 07, 10:06 PM
BayeuxTapestry
7 yrs
Deviant_Mind wrote:
You could explore your new found bisexuality.

He's been doing that on gaydar since last Thursday.

24 Jun 07, 10:18 PM
snotty
8 yrs
m0nkey wrote:
Deviant_Mind wrote:
You could explore your new found bisexuality.

He's been doing that on gaydar since last Thursday.

Been on for months. User name, surprise surprise, snotty_glasgow. Cant figure out how to link it. If someone else can, please go ahead, my profile is heavy on the lulz.

Edited 24 Jun 07, 10:22 PM by snotty

24 Jun 07, 10:22 PM
BayeuxTapestry
7 yrs
snotty wrote:
Been on for months. User name, surprise surprise, snotty_glasgow. Cant figur eout how to link it. If someone else can, please go ahead.

www.gaydar.co.uk/snotty_glasgow

25 Jun 07, 12:57 AM
tongueincheek
UK, 5 yrs
Deviant_Mind wrote:
Just wondering what sort of interest there is in an U35 Glasgow munch?

I am aware that some people are against age restricted munches. However, I think it would be a good thing for the scene in Glasgow. It would Perhaps re-attract those who have become disillusioned with the munches and attract more young people to the scene. Who otherwise wouldn't go to a munch.

I don't really want a debate on the merits of an U35 munch. Just want to gauge interest.

Thanks Deviant_Mind

Is this an attempt to claim recognition for the least number of people attending a munch ?

Should I review my network and remove people under the age of 35 ?

Will you be advocating euthanasia for the over 35,s ?

To quote W.C. Fields " Youth is wasted on the young "

On a final point, I would not attend on a point of principle .

25 Jun 07, 1:06 AM
Dallas
UK, 8 yrs
tongueincheek wrote:

Is this an attempt to claim recognition for the least number of people attending a munch ?

Should I review my network and remove people under the age of 35 ?

Will you be advocating euthanasia for the over 35,s ?

To quote W.C. Fields " Youth is wasted on the young "

On a final point, I would not attend on a point of principle .

Just to echo tongueincheek's sentiments, I am profoundly disappoionted at this exclusionary measure and advise that I won't make it due distance and other commitments...namely age :-p

Dallas

25 Jun 07, 1:08 AM
mini_velvet
UK(EH), 6 yrs
I wouldn't go. I don't have any problem with going to an all ages munch and don't feel a need for an under 35 one.

Good luck with running it though

And the day came when the risk to remain tight in a bud was more painful than the risk it took to blossom.

25 Jun 07, 10:52 AM
Sir_O_Gate
UK(PH), 5 yrs
£
Aw kool under35 munch !

- me has raided Kats sewing box and found tape measure - but am it inches ? ( cos then me is in easy ) but if its centyfingies me is jus' too tall !

Hey Ho

SoG

25 Jun 07, 11:31 AM
bohnanza
UK(FK), 12 yrs

Lady_in_training wrote:
I dont think there would be more drama. I think it might be a good place for people to meet other young bdsmers. After all if you are a 19 yo sub you dont want to only meet men way out of your age range. I think a under 35 limit might encourage more young people to come along.

By meet do you mean go out with? I am sure you aren't saying 19 year olds should never meet 40 year olds in a social context. Society reckons 19 year olds are mature enough to buy alcohol, get married, fight and die for their country, yet you seem to think they should be protected from making decisions about who they go out with.

tongueincheek wrote:

Is this an attempt to claim recognition for the least number of people attending a munch ?

To do that they would need the organiser and only two others to attend. I have been to a four person munch. It was in Inverness, there was the organiser, us two and a bloke there on holiday. Not one local, apart from the organiser, bothered to attend, yet people regularly post wondering why there isn't a munch in Inverness.

Science, the only religion that works even if you don't believe in it.
http://www.guidenet.net/resources/wanker.html
The World's worst website

25 Jun 07, 1:37 PM
Satin_Mistress
UK, 5 yrs
tongueincheek wrote:

Is this an attempt to claim recognition for the least number of people attending a munch ?

ermm, Huh ??

I DO recognise the sarcasm, but I'm not getting the point you're making.

(For every opinion there is an equal and opposite criticism)

25 Jun 07, 1:47 PM
mroberts
UK(EH), 6 yrs

I would probably go ... would depend on transport among other things.

Next page

This is the standard version
©1997-2012 Informed Consent
UK map

UK Map

UK listings
Clubs
Munches
Groups
Dungeon Hire
Services
Kink-friendly
Shops
Other countries
Dictionary
BDSM
Fetish
Top
Bottom
Bondage
Dominant
Submissive
RACK vs SSC
Top Pictures
Rate the pictures

Top BDSM Books
The Story of O
Showing you the Ropes
Female Domination
The Ethical Slut
The Human Pony

More sites
IC's advertisers
BDSM Rights
Kink.com
Kink Podcasts
The Slave Register
Ownership & Possession

Help & About IC