Lingus's profile . Lingus's homepage
 |
| Lingus |
I was having a lively discussion with my sister about which men fancied most. Thin/supermodel types, or the more 'generously proportioned' females.
I told her that as far as I was concerned, there were a few exceptions to the rule, ie Kylie, Carol Smilie, Amanda Holden, Halle Berry and…can't think of any more at the moment. Then I go the other way…..Women that she calls “nothing but blobs”, like Sharon from Eastenders?…Kat from the same programme, Fern Brittan… (mm..mmm…mmmmm!) , the late Jill Dando (again, very strange that she should think that she's a 'blob') this time FOUR mmm's, back in the 70's Uhura from Star Trek, Gillian Joseph, (who presents LDN BBC NEWS) …I could go on and on. To me, and a substantial number of men these are real WOMEN. Something to really get hold of.
Now you're wondering what has this got to do with this entries title?…….ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. I gave that title just to prove a point. You see I've been having a discussion with a lady on this site. She came out with that old, old chestnut about women being more interested in relationships than sex. Now hold on a minute.. calm down! Yes that's true to a certain extent, but not as much as you would have us believe, and the fact that you're a member of IC speaks for itself. “Well yes, that's true as far as it goes” she continued “but men are just so obsessed with the physical and always forget about the emotional…”, again true to a certain extent, but there are plenty of exceptions. I for example would love, LOVE to have a Wife, kids etc, and I'm really aware these days that the clock is ticking, but lets not kid ourselfs..the physical side matters, BIG TIME,...especially to us that are into BDSM of one sort or another. I guess it's the same for most of us that once you've had a taste, you're hooked! ... Anyway the discussion went on and on…SO, I told her that all I'd have to do is give a log entry a title that was unmistakably sexual and I bet her that it'd get a bigger response than any other entry I'd made. So to all the Ladies that have helped me to decide the issue, a big thank you! To some/most of you if I'm correct it'll be no surprise, but a few of you, just like the female that I'm having the discussion with probably won't ever accept that, although to me it's obvious. I mean we've had the sexual revolution, and this IS the 21st century after all! And isn't this battle between the sexes stuff a little boring now? I tell you what though, during the six weeks that I've been a member I think I've changed considerably. I've changed my ad around quite a lot..but not to much..wouldn't it be wrong to assume that all females are looking for a lengthy stable relationship? Wouldn't it be patronizing/ chauvenistic or whatever to suggest that a female can't just be a "wannashag"? Jesus..If we're not careful all this "social correctness" is going to make sexual fullfillment a dirty phrase. You figure it out..my brains starting to hurt.
Bloody-hell...I started this entry with a definate idea about what I was going to say and now I realize it's not as crystal as I thought.
Incidently, if you're thinking “what does the hell does he know about the pleasures of CP anyway…he's a Dom!…..hold on a while… who says that it's always been so? More next time, including a total for the number of visits this entry attains...
Edited Sat 12 Jul 03, 2:17 AM by Lingus
