 |
 |
 |
 |
Informed Consent
16 Mar 2010, 2:44 PM GMT
You are
Help&About
Donate!
Web Boards -
Discussions about BDSM and IC
Help forum
Groups -
Member-run forums, about
particular events or topics.
Weblogs -
Members' writing.
UK map -
Local topics
Top BDSM Books
Top Pictures -
Rate,
Search
Chatrooms -
Talk live to other people
UK listings - including:
Calendar,
Event Dates,
Clubs,
Munches,
Groups,
Websites,
Services,
Kink-friendly,
Shops -
Other countries
Dictionary -
BDSM,
Fetish,
etc
The Mistress Index
Personal Ads -
including UK
M4f,
M4m,
F4m,
F4f,
m4F,
m4M,
f4M,
f4F
The Slave Register,
BDSM Rights
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
IC : Weblogs : feitheachd : "Blogging For Backlash"
Blogging For Backlash (1)
feitheachd's profile
Posted by feitheachd on Mon 9 Oct 06, 10:01 PM
Blogging For Backlash.
Despite the crazy pervert persona that I like to project, I don't particularly enjoy the sort of pornography that is likely to be caught up in the misguided tentacles of this government's proposed legislation.
But that's not the point; objection to the imposition of any law should be based on principles, not on whether it might have a personal impact.
I don't know the ins and outs of the proposed legislation; I've read it and I have some experience in untangling legal language, but even so, I'm still not completely sure about what might send me to prison for three years and what won't.
This alone makes it bad law.
It's bad law that seems, at least in part, to be motivated by this government's obsession with image; it's bad law that seeks to criminalise what we think; it's bad law that is unnecessary and it's bad law that simply doesn't achieve what it's supposedly designed to do.
Isn't ironic that just at the time the prison system is breaking down through overcrowding, this government is seeking new reasons to make it worse?
Bad law undermines us all, no matter what our particular proclivities might be.
Edited Tue 10 Oct 06, 4:47 PM by feitheachd
Replies
9 Oct 06, 11:37 PM TheMarquise UK, 4 yrs
|
feitheachd wrote:
Blogging For Backlash.
Despite the crazy pervert persona that I like to project, I don't particularly enjoy the sort of pornography that is likely to be caught up in the misguided tentacles of this government's proposed legislation.
But that's not the point; objection to the imposition of any law should be based on principles, not on whether it might have a personal impact.
I don't know the ins and outs of the proposed legislation; I've read it and I have some experience in untangling legal language, but even so, I'm still not completely sure about what might send me to prison for three years and what won't.
This alone makes it bad law.
It's bad law that seems, at least in part, to be motivated by this governments obsession with image; it's bad law that seeks to criminalise what we think; it's bad law that is unnecessary and it's bad law that simply doesn't achieve what it's supposedly designed to do.
Isn't ironic that just at the time the prison system is breaking down through overcrowding, this government is seeking new reasons to make it worse?
Bad law undermines us, all no matter what our particular proclivities might be.
| I couldn't agree more and whilst the images on my site and my own collection of pictures of models from the 1950s are unlikely to be part of the images this legislation seeks to outlaw as you say that isn't the point. Also, you never know!
I am sure I have looked at one or two images in my time that could contravene these unclear guidelines. It clearly hasn't perverted me as I am a pervert already!
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|