Is it time to raise the bar? (96)

This topic is now full - if you want to reply, please make a new post on the board itself.

This post is on the Pro-Mistresses etc web board.

30 Jun 08, 7:29 PM
MistressLadyAnna
UK(BD), 2 yrs
£

SemiTrainedApe wrote:

MistressLadyAnna wrote:
...and I get flowers, or choccies, or stockings and sometimes I get Champagne to quaff.

Sometimes at work I get free doughnuts.
Who's the winner, now, eh?

...and I get my hair brushed...for ages...

"If no sexual offence is being committed it seems very odd indeed that there should be an offence for having an image of something which was not an offence," Lord Wallace of Tankerness
http://www.ladyanna.co.uk/

30 Jun 08, 8:18 PM
BikerButch
UK, 3 yrs
MistressLadyAnna wrote:

SemiTrainedApe wrote:

MistressLadyAnna wrote:
...and I get flowers, or choccies, or stockings and sometimes I get Champagne to quaff.

Sometimes at work I get free doughnuts.
Who's the winner, now, eh?

...and I get my hair brushed...for ages...

have you seen his pic???? he has well more hair!! sorry pretty lady but 4/10 must try harder!

30 Jun 08, 8:25 PM
MistressLadyAnna
UK(BD), 2 yrs
£

BikerButch wrote:

MistressLadyAnna wrote:

SemiTrainedApe wrote:

MistressLadyAnna wrote:
...and I get flowers, or choccies, or stockings and sometimes I get Champagne to quaff.

Sometimes at work I get free doughnuts.
Who's the winner, now, eh?

...and I get my hair brushed...for ages...

have you seen his pic???? he has well more hair!! sorry pretty lady but 4/10 must try harder!

My point is that I get mine brushed. I bet he doesn't get his brushed. He'll just get doughnut crumbs stuck in his armpits or something.
"If no sexual offence is being committed it seems very odd indeed that there should be an offence for having an image of something which was not an offence," Lord Wallace of Tankerness
http://www.ladyanna.co.uk/

30 Jun 08, 10:22 PM
Jahc99
UK, 2 yrs

MistressLadyAnna wrote:
My point is that I get mine brushed. I bet he doesn't get his brushed. He'll just get doughnut crumbs stuck in his armpits or something.
Yeah, but he is rather proud of getting shit stuck in his fur.
You know, I might even pay to witness you ripping it out, if you do scat? Or maybe just shock the monkey...

30 Jun 08, 11:08 PM
SemiTrainedApe
UK(LA), 14 mths

Jahc99 wrote:
Yeah, but he is rather proud of getting shit stuck in his fur.

It adds character, J. It adds character.

You know, I might even pay to witness you ripping it out, if you do scat?

Whoah - don't I get a say in this?

It's not illegal if the monkey's up for it.

30 Jun 08, 11:41 PM
The_Inner_Whore
UK(E), 3 yrs
d_s_electable wrote:
Without judging the financial side, I am expressing that money being included in the balance, I see it as business and not a personal relationship, which makes it not for me.
Yes, it's very often assumed by those who have no first hand, close experience of pro-Dommes, that money automatically excludes the possibility of personal relationships. Wrong. it0s a prejudiced preconception, an urban myth if you wish. There are personal relationships with money as part of them. I'd be interested to know why one thing, in your opinion, automatically excludes the other.

d_s_electable wrote:
Instead of reading a bit better, you unfortunately jumped to conclusions. And defended yourself in a funny way, by claiming authority, the thing you accused me of in the first place.
The difference being that lady Anna, with her background, can claim to be an authority on the subject at hand, while you cannot. Unless you are a pro-Domme and are talking from your own experience.
Cultivate your inner whore

30 Jun 08, 11:43 PM
MistressLadyAnna
UK(BD), 2 yrs
£

d_s_electable wrote:

Mistress_Susannah wrote:
For the record I don't think you're baiting either - but I do want to answer some of your points, 'cos I'm that kinda gal!
Thank you for your detailed answer and I can only have respect - for whatever it is worth to you - for the way you answer.

MistressLadyAnna wrote:

d_s_electable wrote:
I do not see where I claim to be an authority on any of this.
You said this
I am a consultant, so I do understand your business.
which seemed to indicate to me that you were claiming some sort of authority on our business.
..... We are an authority on lifestyle relationships and we are an authority on professional play. ....
This is quite funny, by saying I understand your business being a consultant, I am claiming authority, according to you, which is the wrong thing to say. But suddenly you are an authority on lifestyle play? And professional play? And that is OK?
What I actually expressed was, by comparing a consultant and a pro-domme, who both have clients and are both often paid on a time-and-material basis, that I "understand" the fact that you want to be paid for your services, in other words, I don't judge it per se. Without judging the financial side, I am expressing that money being included in the balance, I see it as business and not a personal relationship, which makes it not for me.
Instead of reading a bit better, you unfortunately jumped to conclusions. And defended yourself in a funny way, by claiming authority, the thing you accused me of in the first place.

Are you completely stupid?
I am lifestyle and I am professional so yes I can claim some authority and knowledge on both sides of the coin (no pun intended).
Following me so far?
You appear to enjoy lifestyle relationships so yes, you can claim some authority there.
You however know nothing about professional domination as you have so clearly illustrated by your stereotypical assumptions in this thread. Yet you say, simply because you are a 'consultant' that you understand our business. Just because you get paid for your time, as we do, does not mean that you understand our business outside of the blindingly obvious.

"If no sexual offence is being committed it seems very odd indeed that there should be an offence for having an image of something which was not an offence," Lord Wallace of Tankerness
http://www.ladyanna.co.uk/

1 Jul 08, 12:05 AM
The_Inner_Whore
UK(E), 3 yrs
d_s_electable wrote:
<codwallop>

Aww, stop pulling my piggy tails, I thought you were a grown, composed man.
Cultivate your inner whore
Edited 1 Jul 08, 12:07 AM by The_Inner_Whore

1 Jul 08, 12:21 AM
wonderer
UK, 2 yrs

d_s_electable wrote:
What I actually expressed was, by comparing a consultant and a pro-domme, who both have clients and are both often paid on a time-and-material basis, that I "understand" the fact that you want to be paid for your services, in other words, I don't judge it per se. Without judging the financial side, I am expressing that money being included in the balance, I see it as business and not a personal relationship, which makes it not for me.

This is the main flaw in his argument. A financial dimension to a relationship does not preclude an interpersonal dimension. In fact most relationships and interactions include a financial aspect.

1 Jul 08, 12:26 AM
The_Inner_Whore
UK(E), 3 yrs
Jahc99 wrote:

SemiTrainedApe wrote:
Whoah - don't I get a say in this?

No, not really. Your time has come, at last, boy.
Are you going to dry bum the Ape? Hurry, before you get three years for monkey sodomy.
Cultivate your inner whore

Next page


	©1997-2009 Informed Consent