Michelle - Woman E Pro Domme? (94)

Moved from Other BDSM

Sat 26 Jul 08, 6:36 AM
subblyjubbly
UK, 7 mths Im just seeing the Sky news interview with women E/ Michelle in the Max Moseley case. Am I right or wrong to think she is a pro-domme who kissed and told? If she is what do you think? Surely "outing" someone is just wrong no matter who they are?
Edited Sat 26 Jul 08, 6:38 AM by subblyjubbly

26 Jul 08, 8:02 AM
male_anger
UK, 6 mths
ive also just watched the interview with the wench. christ - i clearly am bored
she said nothing to justify doing what she did. i didnt like her much at the start - and now i fucking hate her
it was a typical "poor me" interview of the type we came to expect from princess bloody diana
Edited 26 Jul 08, 8:09 AM by male_anger

26 Jul 08, 8:19 AM
male_anger
UK, 6 mths
it also seems that the news of the world are turning on "woman e". which should be a warning to other greedy people that the press are NEVER loyal to a person who sells them a story. and that you just as likely to be eventually attacked by the tabloids yourself
In a statement, the News of the World said "it accepts the ruling of Mr Justice Eady that the 30 March event was not intended to be, and was not Nazi in character. We do however reject Woman E's claims about what she told us.
"Woman E and her husband both provided signed witness statements for use in the litigation. These statements were given by them to the News of the World's solicitors and not obtained by any member of staff of the News of the World.
"Woman E's signed witness statement said not only that she was told to expect a 'German Theme' to the party with Mr Mosley but also that she was told that Mr Mosley had asked for a German Nazi style scene and that the party was to be Nazi camp style.
"Woman E said she and the other women at the event were told to expect a 'concentration camp' style. That is what the News of the World believed was the position.
"The claim we made in our article, and defended in court, that the events of 28 March 2008 were "Nazi-style" has been held to be untrue. However, as the Judge has accepted, it is a claim that the News of the World believed to be true."

26 Jul 08, 8:27 AM
NakMuay
UK, 18 mths

male_anger wrote:
ive also just watched the interview with the wench. christ - i clearly am bored
she said nothing to justify doing what she did. i didnt like her much at the start - and now i fucking hate her
it was a typical "poor me" interview of the type we came to expect from princess bloody diana
The Interview
It takes guts and a sense of decency to stand up and admit that you were wrong particularly in the glare of such publicity and in the midst of so many personal problems. What she did was an act of greed, deceit and betrayal but I respect her for owning up to that and apologising for the damage she caused.

26 Jul 08, 8:34 AM
deexxx
ES, 3 yrs£
but how did she get paid for the interview??
http://www.madamdee.com

26 Jul 08, 8:40 AM
subblyjubbly
UK, 7 mths
NakMuay wrote:

male_anger wrote:
ive also just watched the interview with the wench. christ - i clearly am bored
she said nothing to justify doing what she did. i didnt like her much at the start - and now i fucking hate her
it was a typical "poor me" interview of the type we came to expect from princess bloody diana
The Interview
It takes guts and a sense of decency to stand up and admit that you were wrong particularly in the glare of such publicity and in the midst of so many personal problems. What she did was an act of greed, deceit and betrayal but I respect her for owning up to that and apologising for the damage she caused.

I agree its commendable to stand up and say "I was wrong, sorry". My point is was she pro D and is it justifiable to out anyone for having a kink? If she is pro D and has done this does it leave the playing field wide open to tittle tattle on any type of story you think might sell? I for one value my privacy and keep things to myself and like it that way.
Edited 26 Jul 08, 8:43 AM by subblyjubbly

26 Jul 08, 8:50 AM
fen_fatale
UK(CB), 4 yrs

NakMuay wrote:
It takes guts and a sense of decency to stand up and admit that you were wrong particularly in the glare of such publicity and in the midst of so many personal problems. What she did was an act of greed, deceit and betrayal but I respect her for owning up to that and apologising for the damage she caused.

I would entirely disagree, i think sorry is only a word, a lip service, it does bugger all to repair any damage to anybody that has been hurt and the word sorry is an empty platitude offered to make only the guilty party feel better about their actions. I have less respect for her now for apologising; it just adds insult to injury!
This Woman E is only now trying to salvage her own character, her own personality and repair damage to herself and her husband. If she was a truely decent woman who understood the consequence of actions and betrayals of trust, power and confidence of her profession then she never would have done it in the first place.
When she recorded that scene for the NOTW she clearly knew what was going to happen, if she thought it wouldn't go in the press, and then wouldn't expose him to his wife then she was incredibly daft!
I always say to my kids, that sorry heals nothing, only acting to never make the same mistake again will go any way to repairing the damage caused, and primarily thinking an action through, before doing something that will need you to say sorry is the only way of being truly considerate to another persons feelings. If you know the consequence of the action to another person and you do it anyway, a sorry afterwards is a meaningless word that will never be accepted.
nuqDaq yuch Dapol? My Photography

26 Jul 08, 8:54 AM
englishh
UK, 4 yrs I suspect she is just trying to avoid getting sued. I have no sympathy for her whatsoever.

26 Jul 08, 9:31 AM
lisal
5 yrs
subblyjubbly wrote:
Michelle - Woman E Pro Domme?
Im just seeing the Sky news interview with women E/ Michelle in the Max Moseley case. Am I right or wrong to think she is a pro-domme who kissed and told? If she is what do you think? Surely "outing" someone is just wrong no matter who they are?
Yes she is (was more likely now) a pro domme
I think it was a horrible thing to do
Outing someone is indeed wrong no matter who they are
It's very unusual for a pro domme to do this. I think it's fair to say quite a few more pro dommes have been outed than their clients. At least three come to mind in the last year - much of which has been discussed on this site

26 Jul 08, 9:40 AM
Anita_Esrader
UK, 3 yrs

NakMuay wrote:
It takes guts and a sense of decency to stand up and admit that you were wrong particularly in the glare of such publicity and in the midst of so many personal problems. What she did was an act of greed, deceit and betrayal but I respect her for owning up to that and apologising for the damage she caused.

Utter Bollocks.
She was greedy, and betrayed her friends, clients and the discretion and confidentiality expected of such a person.
She was stitched up by NOTW (aint that a surprise) and is now scrabbling around to try to buy back some credibility.
She is beneath contempt.
How can ANYONE trust visiting a Pro domme now that this has happened...She has done the scene and Pro Dommes in particular, no favours whatsoever.
I am gonna be a bride and a groom, but on two different days.
DATE to be announced..
Edited 26 Jul 08, 9:43 AM by Anita_Esrader

26 Jul 08, 9:50 AM
lisal
5 yrs
Anita_Esrader wrote:
How can ANYONE trust visiting a Pro domme now that this has happened...She has done the scene and Pro Dommes in particular, no favours whatsoever.
I agree she has done pro dommes no favours at all
However, I think most of us who regularly visit pro dommes recognise that this is pretty much a "one off" and our views won't change. I trust my domme completely and my friends who are pro domme clients feel the same
What it may well do, very unfortunately, is to deter newbies. I sincerely hope it doesn't as, I repeat, in my experience this is a highly unusual case

Next page


	©1997-2008 Informed Consent